Measure The Carbon Cost Of Running Your Software — Then Reduce It
Sustainability reporting fails when it stops at a corporate total nobody can act on. We measure emissions attributable to your workloads, attribute them to the services and teams that generate them, and identify the architectural and operational changes that reduce them — measured against a baseline you can defend.
Carbon and cost are largely the same signal read two ways: idle capacity wastes both. The waste surfaced by FinOps is usually the same waste that drives emissions, the estate is the one assessed by cloud governance, and the efficiency gains land in the architecture designed through architecture and design. We treat sustainability as an engineering discipline, not a reporting exercise.
The challenges we solve
How we help
A defensible starting measurement for your estate, built from cloud provider carbon reporting and utilisation telemetry, with the estimation method stated openly.
Emissions attributed to services, environments and teams — because a number nobody owns never moves.
Where region choice, instance family, scheduling, storage tiering and autoscaling behaviour are costing you avoidable emissions.
Right-sizing, workload consolidation, dormant-environment shutdown and demand shifting, prioritised by impact and effort.
Reporting traceable to source data and stated assumptions, so a claim survives scrutiny from an auditor or a customer's procurement team.
Ownership, review cadence and the metrics that keep efficiency in the backlog rather than in a pledge.
We assess and map against these standards — we don't claim certification by them.
What you receive
Real, governed artefacts — not slideware.